Credible Autonomy Safety Argumentation

Abstract

A significant challenge to deploying mission- and safety-critical autonomous systems is the difficulty of creating a credible assurance argument. This paper collects lessons learned from having observed both credible and faulty assurance argumentation attempts, with a primary emphasis on autonomous ground vehicle safety cases. Various common argumentation approaches are described, including conformance to a non-autonomy safety standard, proven in use, field testing, simulation, and formal verification. Of particular note are argumentation faults and anti-patterns that have shown up in numerous safety cases that we have encountered. These observations can help both designers and auditors detect common mistakes in safety argumentation for autonomous systems.

Koopman, P., Kane, A. & Black, J., Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, Bristol UK, Feb. 2019.

Skills

Posted on

February 13, 2019